"To mirror the wishes of the Iranian people interviewed in Danish media, I hope the much-desired system change will happen in Iran." - maybe to mirror the wishes of Iranians in Iran, we could hope that desired system changes will happen in Israel and the US, so they would stop bombing, imposing sanctions, and committing genocides? It is quite shameful that your only "hope" in the entire newsletter is the change of the government of the attacked country.
"linked to the conflict between Israel, the US, and Iran" - no, it is an illegal attack on Iran by Israel and the US that is causing the "disruptions". UN Charter and such?
"Observers say the situation reflects deep divisions among people about the future of Iran and whether military attacks can actually bring political change." - then the observers must do a better job considering the bombing of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen... Just kidding, they know it well and lie about it.
I know it is difficult to be "neutral" as journalists, but reproducing Western bias ain't it. The attacker and the defender are here clear as ever, even clearer than in the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The words "illegal" or "unprovoked" are adequate. Otherwise, you are unwillingly contributing to war propaganda...
"Several top executives say they may consider leaving the country if a new wealth tax is introduced" - good riddance.
"the controversial Kærshovedgård deportation center" - also known as "social death in Denmark" or a "concentration camp".
"To mirror the wishes of the Iranian people interviewed in Danish media, I hope the much-desired system change will happen in Iran." - maybe to mirror the wishes of Iranians in Iran, we could hope that desired system changes will happen in Israel and the US, so they would stop bombing, imposing sanctions, and committing genocides? It is quite shameful that your only "hope" in the entire newsletter is the change of the government of the attacked country.
"linked to the conflict between Israel, the US, and Iran" - no, it is an illegal attack on Iran by Israel and the US that is causing the "disruptions". UN Charter and such?
"Observers say the situation reflects deep divisions among people about the future of Iran and whether military attacks can actually bring political change." - then the observers must do a better job considering the bombing of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen... Just kidding, they know it well and lie about it.
I know it is difficult to be "neutral" as journalists, but reproducing Western bias ain't it. The attacker and the defender are here clear as ever, even clearer than in the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The words "illegal" or "unprovoked" are adequate. Otherwise, you are unwillingly contributing to war propaganda...
"Several top executives say they may consider leaving the country if a new wealth tax is introduced" - good riddance.
"the controversial Kærshovedgård deportation center" - also known as "social death in Denmark" or a "concentration camp".